|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
Mother
Nature's Medicine Cabinet
Scientists
scour the earth
in search of miracle drugs.
By
Kate Wong
©
1996-2003 Scientific American, Inc., April 09, 2001 |
|
| |
|
| |
From the plant-choked jungles of Malaysia
to the coral reefs of the Caribbean, scientists
are combing the planet for cures to our most intractable
maladies. Such bioprospecting is tedious work —
on average only one in thousands of natural compounds
tested shows pharmaceutical promise, and only a
handful of those ever make it to market. Yet despite
the high risk of failure, researchers press on,
driven by the realization that with millions of
years of experience under her belt, Nature is the
ultimate chemist.
Indeed, nearly half
of all human pharmaceuticals now in use were originally
derived from natural sources. Perhaps the most famous
example is aspirin, which evolved from a compound
found in the bark and leaves of the willow tree
and was later marketed by Bayer starting in 1899.
Some 50 years later, scientists identified anticancer
compounds in the rosy periwinkle (above), which
pharmaceutical heavyweight Eli Lilly subsequently
produced for the treatment of leukemia and Hodgkin‚s
disease. Other well-known examples include the cancer-fighting
Taxol, isolated from the Pacific yew tree, and Aggrastat,
an anticoagulant based on the venom of the saw-scaled
viper from Africa.
Today many other compounds
taken from Nature's medicine cabinet are showing
promise. And with thousands of species as yet untapped
for their chemical potions, it's tempting to compare
bioprospectors to the proverbial kids in a candy
store. But in fact, those sweet rewards sometimes
come at tremendous cost. Researchers are increasingly
finding themselves at odds with traditional healers
in many parts of the world, who have long made use
of plants and animals to treat various ailments,
and with Nature herself, who does not typically
part with anything without ecological consequences.
That there is a need for
new drugs to combat AIDS, Alzheimer's and other
ailments, however, goes without saying. In addition,
researchers are under mounting pressure to find
compounds to replace those that have become less
effective. With bacterial resistance on the rise,
for example, the world desperately needs new antibiotics.
The same holds true for cancer drugs, which can
lose their potency in a patient over time. And Nature
may still be the best place to hunt for such lifesaving
compounds.
Finding the Needle in the Haystack
With about 10 million species inhabiting the earth,
how do scientists determine which ones contain potential
panaceas? In many cases they are screening randomly
— a process that yields on average one useful
drug for every 20,000 samples analyzed. But other
researchers employ a different strategy, consulting
indigenous people when possible. According to Conservation
International, studies have shown that plants identified
by locals are in fact up to 60 percent more likely
to have pharmaceutical potential than their randomly
collected counterparts.
Recently plants and sessile
or slow-moving marine invertebrates such as sponges,
corals and sea slugs have attracted particular attention
because for these organisms, running away from a
predator is not an option. Instead they have chemical
defenses. And with a little tweaking, the potent
toxins they produce — as well as those manufactured
by certain poisonous snakes, frogs and land invertebrates
— can actually save lives.
DRUGS
FROM PLANTS
Many drugs in use today have their
basis in wild plants. A small selection of
these are shown here:
Drugs
derived from wild plants
|
Plant
|
Location |
Drug |
Use |
Willow |
Worldwide |
Aspirin |
Fever and pain |
| Cinchone |
Tropics |
Quinine |
Malaria |
| Rosy
Periwinkle |
Madagascar |
Vincristine |
Leukemia |
| Rosy
Periwinkle |
Madagascar |
Vinblastine |
Hodgkin's
disease |
| Pacific
Yew |
Pacific
Northwest |
Taxol |
Ovarian
cancer |
| Opium
Poppy |
Eurasia,
Africa |
Morphine |
Pain |
| Curare |
Amazon |
Tubocurarine |
Muscle
relaxant |
| Snakeroot |
India |
Reserpine |
Hypertension |
| Foxglove |
Eurasia,
Africa |
Digoxin |
Cardiac
arrhythmia |
Of
course, targeting a promising compound is only
the first step. Before developing a drug from
it, a renewable resource for the compound has
to be established. This task poses an enormous
barrier. Because these compounds often come from
rare or slow-growing organisms, or are produced
in minute quantities, harvesting the source organisms
in sufficient amounts may be unrealistic.
To address this problem,
researchers usually try to make synthetic derivatives.
But sometimes synthesis proves impossible, or
uneconomical, as in the case of Ecteinascidin-743,
an anticancer compound currently in clinical trials
that comes from a creature called a sea squirt.
Scientists from CalBioMarine Technologies in Carlsbad,
Calif., have developed a method of culturing the
animal, going so far as creating an artificial
version of the mangrove roots it settles on in
the wild. In other cases, simply culturing cells
from the source organism is sufficient.
Once developed, these
drugs, as with all proposed pharmaceuticals, must
pass a battery of rigorous test that evaluate
their safety and efficacy in animals and then
humans. This step, too, can take its toll, especially
on start-up companies. Take, for example, the
case of Shaman Pharmaceuticals, a once-promising
company armed with a product poised to treat people
suffering from chronic diarrhea. Their drug, Provir
— derived from the sap of croton, a common
Amazonian tree—did so well in two years
of clinical trials that the FDA granted it fast-track
status, requiring only one final Phase III trial
instead of two. When the FDA later decided to
demand a second Phase III trial, though, Shaman
couldn't afford it. Today the company sells dietary
supplements.
Bioprospecting or Biopiracy?
In addition to the difficulties
posed by the research itself, the scientists and
pharmaceutical companies hunting for natural miracle
drugs face critical ethical dilemmas. In Brazil,
for example, officials have expressed concern
over the possibility that the scientific demand
for plant samples has led to plant smuggling.
And indigenous groups around the world worry that
in the race to patent Nature's million-dollar
molecules, science is stealing their intellectual
property.
Indeed, according to
a report that appeared earlier this year in the
Atlanta Journal and Constitution, even a project
that aimed to share future profits with the native
people — Mayans in Mexico's Chiapas state
— has floundered, owing to disagreements
over who owns the plants, folk knowledge and commercial
rights to whatever drugs might result from the
collaboration.
Other efforts to ensure
these often poorer nations benefit from visits
from bioprospectors have had happier outcomes.
In South America's Suriname, for instance, Bristol
Myers-Squibb, scientists and conservationists
from the Missouri Botanical Gardens, the Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and Conservation International
helped to establish a four-million-acre reserve.
Conservation International has also been active
in helping the governments of Madagascar and Indonesia
to develop policies aimed at maintaining national
sovereignty over their biological resources.
On the Horizon
Bioprospecting during
the past decade has yet to turn up a blockbuster
drug, but a number of naturally derived pharmaceuticals
are being evaluated in human trials. These include
compounds ranging from Immunokine, derived from
the venom of the Thailand cobra, which may effectively
combat multiple sclerosis, to calanolide A, an
anti-HIV agent retrieved from a Malaysian plant.
Ziconotide, a potent pain reliever extracted from
the tropical marine cone snail, has come particularly
far and is awaiting FDA approval. Once approved,
Ziconotide will become the first marine-organism-based
pharmaceutical.
In many cases, though,
the environments in which potentially healing
organisms live are being destroyed. Estimates
place the number of species screened for their
medicinal properties at a mere 1 percent, yet
each year more than 30 million acres of tropical
forest are lost. Human activity is taking its
toll on the oceans, too, in the form of pollution
and overfishing. Such large-scale destruction
of our planet's complex ecosystems will no doubt
come back to haunt us — if for no other
reason than the fact that with every species lost,
Mother Nature is taking potentially lifesaving
chemical formulas to the grave.
©
1996-2003 Scientific American, Inc.
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|