| |
May 26, 2005
Exposure to smoke has long
been held as a factor thought to affect a woman’s ability to become pregnant. The Canadian study
now indicates, however, that sidestream smoke given off by
a smouldering cigarette is just as damaging. The research team,
from McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences in Ontario,
studied 225 women having fertility treatment.
The team compared
the quality of embryos and the implantation and pregnancy rates
of non-smokers, smokers or sidestream smokers — defined as
women living with a partner who smoked regularly. The findings,
published in the journal Human Reproduction, found that there
was no difference in embryo quality between the three groups.
But they found that there was a striking difference in implantation
and pregnancy rates between non-smokers and the other two groups.
It is estimated that one in seven couples in Britain has difficulty
conceiving — about 3.5 million people. Around 1 per cent of
all births are the result of IVF and donor insemination. More
than 8,500 babies were born through IVF last year, with close
to 30,000 patients having treatment.
Michael Neal, a member
of the McMaster team, said that the damaging effects of passive
smoking were so clear that they were now warning all patients
about the potential hazards to fertility. “We found that embryo
quality and fertilisation rates were similar in the three groups,
but there was a significant difference in the pregnancy rates
per embryo transfer, with the non-smokers achieving around
48 per cent, the smokers around 19 per cent and the sidestream
smokers 20 per cent,” he said. Success rates for women having
IVF treatment in Britain drop dramatically between the age
of 35 and 40, with 27.6 per cent of patients becoming pregnant
under 35 and just 10 per cent between the ages of 40 and 42.
Warren Foster, a senior researcher, said that a further study
was needed to confirm their results: “The findings from our
study already warrant a warning to women to reduce or, if possible,
prevent exposure to cigarette smoking, especially if they are
trying to conceive.”
The researchers now want to look at why
there is no difference in the appearance and development of
embryos before they are implanted in the three groups, but
a large decrease in the ability of embryos from sidestream
smokers and smokers to implant or maintain a pregnancy. Mr
Neal said that it was possible that cigarette smoke damaged
the egg, but the lethal results were not apparent until later
in the embryo’s development.
He added: “Our study is unique in looking at the female, who is just as vulnerable,
if not more vulnerable, to environmental toxicants such as cigarette smoke.”
© 2005 Times
Newspapers Ltd.
|