|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
Mother
Nature's Medicine Cabinet
Scientists
scour the earth
in search of miracle drugs.
By
Kate Wong
©
1996-2003 Scientific American, Inc., April 09, 2001 |
|
| |
|
| |
From the plant-choked jungles of Malaysia to
the coral reefs of the Caribbean, scientists are combing
the planet for cures to our most intractable maladies. Such
bioprospecting is tedious work — on average only one
in thousands of natural compounds tested shows pharmaceutical
promise, and only a handful of those ever make it to market.
Yet despite the high risk of failure, researchers press
on, driven by the realization that with millions of years
of experience under her belt, Nature is the ultimate chemist.
Indeed, nearly half of all
human pharmaceuticals now in use were originally derived
from natural sources. Perhaps the most famous example is
aspirin, which evolved from a compound found in the bark
and leaves of the willow tree and was later marketed by
Bayer starting in 1899. Some 50 years later, scientists
identified anticancer compounds in the rosy periwinkle (above),
which pharmaceutical heavyweight Eli Lilly subsequently
produced for the treatment of leukemia and Hodgkin‚s
disease. Other well-known examples include the cancer-fighting
Taxol, isolated from the Pacific yew tree, and Aggrastat,
an anticoagulant based on the venom of the saw-scaled viper
from Africa.
Today many other compounds taken
from Nature's medicine cabinet are showing promise. And
with thousands of species as yet untapped for their chemical
potions, it's tempting to compare bioprospectors to the
proverbial kids in a candy store. But in fact, those sweet
rewards sometimes come at tremendous cost. Researchers are
increasingly finding themselves at odds with traditional
healers in many parts of the world, who have long made use
of plants and animals to treat various ailments, and with
Nature herself, who does not typically part with anything
without ecological consequences.
That there is a need for new drugs
to combat AIDS, Alzheimer's and other ailments, however,
goes without saying. In addition, researchers are under
mounting pressure to find compounds to replace those that
have become less effective. With bacterial resistance on
the rise, for example, the world desperately needs new antibiotics.
The same holds true for cancer drugs, which can lose their
potency in a patient over time. And Nature may still be
the best place to hunt for such lifesaving compounds.
Finding the Needle in the Haystack
With about 10 million species inhabiting the earth, how
do scientists determine which ones contain potential panaceas?
In many cases they are screening randomly — a process
that yields on average one useful drug for every 20,000
samples analyzed. But other researchers employ a different
strategy, consulting indigenous people when possible. According
to Conservation International, studies have shown that plants
identified by locals are in fact up to 60 percent more likely
to have pharmaceutical potential than their randomly collected
counterparts.
Recently plants and sessile or
slow-moving marine invertebrates such as sponges, corals
and sea slugs have attracted particular attention because
for these organisms, running away from a predator is not
an option. Instead they have chemical defenses. And with
a little tweaking, the potent toxins they produce —
as well as those manufactured by certain poisonous snakes,
frogs and land invertebrates — can actually save lives.
DRUGS
FROM PLANTS
Many drugs in use today have their basis
in wild plants. A small selection of these are shown
here:
Drugs
derived from wild plants
|
Plant
|
Location |
Drug |
Use |
Willow |
Worldwide |
Aspirin |
Fever and pain |
| Cinchone |
Tropics |
Quinine |
Malaria |
| Rosy
Periwinkle |
Madagascar |
Vincristine |
Leukemia |
| Rosy
Periwinkle |
Madagascar |
Vinblastine |
Hodgkin's
disease |
| Pacific
Yew |
Pacific
Northwest |
Taxol |
Ovarian
cancer |
| Opium
Poppy |
Eurasia,
Africa |
Morphine |
Pain |
| Curare |
Amazon |
Tubocurarine |
Muscle
relaxant |
| Snakeroot |
India |
Reserpine |
Hypertension |
| Foxglove |
Eurasia,
Africa |
Digoxin |
Cardiac
arrhythmia |
Of
course, targeting a promising compound is only the first
step. Before developing a drug from it, a renewable resource
for the compound has to be established. This task poses
an enormous barrier. Because these compounds often come
from rare or slow-growing organisms, or are produced in
minute quantities, harvesting the source organisms in
sufficient amounts may be unrealistic.
To address this problem, researchers
usually try to make synthetic derivatives. But sometimes
synthesis proves impossible, or uneconomical, as in the
case of Ecteinascidin-743, an anticancer compound currently
in clinical trials that comes from a creature called a
sea squirt. Scientists from CalBioMarine Technologies
in Carlsbad, Calif., have developed a method of culturing
the animal, going so far as creating an artificial version
of the mangrove roots it settles on in the wild. In other
cases, simply culturing cells from the source organism
is sufficient.
Once developed, these drugs,
as with all proposed pharmaceuticals, must pass a battery
of rigorous test that evaluate their safety and efficacy
in animals and then humans. This step, too, can take its
toll, especially on start-up companies. Take, for example,
the case of Shaman Pharmaceuticals, a once-promising company
armed with a product poised to treat people suffering
from chronic diarrhea. Their drug, Provir — derived
from the sap of croton, a common Amazonian tree—did
so well in two years of clinical trials that the FDA granted
it fast-track status, requiring only one final Phase III
trial instead of two. When the FDA later decided to demand
a second Phase III trial, though, Shaman couldn't afford
it. Today the company sells dietary supplements.
Bioprospecting or Biopiracy?
In addition to the difficulties
posed by the research itself, the scientists and pharmaceutical
companies hunting for natural miracle drugs face critical
ethical dilemmas. In Brazil, for example, officials have
expressed concern over the possibility that the scientific
demand for plant samples has led to plant smuggling. And
indigenous groups around the world worry that in the race
to patent Nature's million-dollar molecules, science is
stealing their intellectual property.
Indeed, according to a report
that appeared earlier this year in the Atlanta Journal
and Constitution, even a project that aimed to share future
profits with the native people — Mayans in Mexico's
Chiapas state — has floundered, owing to disagreements
over who owns the plants, folk knowledge and commercial
rights to whatever drugs might result from the collaboration.
Other efforts to ensure these
often poorer nations benefit from visits from bioprospectors
have had happier outcomes. In South America's Suriname,
for instance, Bristol Myers-Squibb, scientists and conservationists
from the Missouri Botanical Gardens, the Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and Conservation International helped to establish
a four-million-acre reserve. Conservation International
has also been active in helping the governments of Madagascar
and Indonesia to develop policies aimed at maintaining
national sovereignty over their biological resources.
On the Horizon
Bioprospecting during the past
decade has yet to turn up a blockbuster drug, but a number
of naturally derived pharmaceuticals are being evaluated
in human trials. These include compounds ranging from
Immunokine, derived from the venom of the Thailand cobra,
which may effectively combat multiple sclerosis, to calanolide
A, an anti-HIV agent retrieved from a Malaysian plant.
Ziconotide, a potent pain reliever extracted from the
tropical marine cone snail, has come particularly far
and is awaiting FDA approval. Once approved, Ziconotide
will become the first marine-organism-based pharmaceutical.
In many cases, though, the environments
in which potentially healing organisms live are being
destroyed. Estimates place the number of species screened
for their medicinal properties at a mere 1 percent, yet
each year more than 30 million acres of tropical forest
are lost. Human activity is taking its toll on the oceans,
too, in the form of pollution and overfishing. Such large-scale
destruction of our planet's complex ecosystems will no
doubt come back to haunt us — if for no other reason
than the fact that with every species lost, Mother Nature
is taking potentially lifesaving chemical formulas to
the grave.
©
1996-2003 Scientific American, Inc.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|