In this review
the abbreviation IUCD refers to this whole group of contraceptives,
and the
terms Mirena and
IUS will be used interchangeably.
Most IUCD's make a woman's
periods heavier, but the Mirena actually makes periods
lighter than usual. Because of this, it is frequently used as a treatment
for heavy periods, even in women who don't need contraception.
As can be seen in the picture, it is made of a light, plastic,
T-shaped frame with the stem of the 'T' a bit thicker than
the rest. This stem contains a tiny storage system of a hormone
called Levonorgestrel. This hormone is also used in contraceptive
pills such as Eugynon, Logynon, Microgynon, Ovran 30, Ovranette
and Trinordial. In the Mirena, however, a much lower dose
is released than when you take the Pill (about 1/7th strength),
and it goes directly to the lining of the womb, rather than
through the blood stream where it may lead to the common
progesterone-type
side effects (see below).
How effective is the contraception?
If 1000 women used the Mirena IUS for a year, only one would
fall pregnant. This compares with about 10 for the normal
IUCD, 20 for the Pill and 10-15 for the injection (Depot
Provera).
This is comparable to the effectiveness of sterilisation.
Mirena acts as a contraceptive in two ways: it makes the
mucus at
the neck of the womb (the cervix) much thicker, preventing
sperm from getting through and it also makes the lining of
the womb extremely thin, stopping implantation. In some women
it prevents egg release (ovulation).
As with all IUCD's,
if it does fail, there is a higher risk of ectopic pregnancy
(a
pregnancy located outside the womb, usually in the tube).
If you felt pregnant or had a positive pregnancy test, it
is important
to see your doctor to rule this out. Overall, however, compared
to women not using any contraception, the risk of ectopic
pregnancy is greatly reduced (around 2 per 10,000 women each
year)
because the IUS is such a good contraceptive.
If a pregnancy
does occur with an IUCD, it is advisable to remove the contraceptive
if possible - this reduces the risk of bleeding, infection
and miscarriage. Because failure is so rare, there is little
information available on the effects on an ongoing pregnancy
with the Mirena still in place.
Fitting the Mirena IUS
Before
it is inserted, the doctor will do an examination to make
sure the womb is a normal size and there is nothing else
unusual
to find. If there is some discharge, swabs will be taken
to rule out infection before it is placed. The IUS is inserted
within a week of beginning a period - this helps to reduce
the chance of expulsion and irregular bleeding (as the womb
lining is already quite thin at this time). It may be inserted
immediately after surgical termination of pregnancy, but
should
be deferred until 6 weeks after delivery of a baby.
A speculum
is placed in the vagina, like when you have a normal smear
test, and the Mirena is placed into the womb through the
cervix. Because it contains the storage of hormone, the stem
is slightly
wider than in normal IUCD's. This can occasionally lead to
difficulties with fitting, especially if you have not had
a baby before. In this situation, it would be helpful to
use
some local anaesthetic. It should be fitted by someone who
has been trained and has experience in fitting IUCD's.
It
is a good idea to take some painkillers a couple of hours
before
the fitting - this will help reduce any discomfort. A good
choice is Ibuprofen 400 mg, which can be bought over-the-counter
at a chemist (please check that this is safe for you). Most
women do not find the insertion procedure very uncomfortable
- usually much less than expected.
Once the IUS is in place,
you won't be able to 'feel' it in your womb. Your doctor
will show you how to check for the strings, and it is very
unusual
for your partner to be aware of it during intercourse. After
fitting, a further appointment should be made for six weeks
later to check the strings can still be seen. Yearly checks
are advised after this appointment.
Removing or changing the Mirena
Removal involves a speculum examination again
and the IUS is removed by pulling on the strings. This is only uncomfortable
for a second or two as it comes out. The hormone effect on the lining of the
womb is reversed within a month and normal periods and fertility returns.
The
IUS will last 5 years and, if required, a new one can be inserted at the same
time the old one is removed.
Mirena for heavy periods
Although the IUS was originally
developed as a contraceptive, the discovery that it leads to much lighter periods
was a great bonus. Many gynaecologists now suggest the Mirena as a treatment
for heavy periods if tablet treatment doesn't work.
After 3 months use, the average
blood loss is 85% less, and by 12 months the flow is reduced by 97% every cycle.
About one third of women using the IUS will not have any periods at all. Although
women initially find it a bit unusual not having periods, it doesn't
cause any problems. There is no 'build up' of blood, because the hormone in
the IUS prevents the lining of the womb from building up at all. Often it is
the
excessive thickening of this lining that is the cause of the problems in the
first place.
One study looked at 54 women who had heavy periods and were awaiting
hysterectomy. They all used the Mirena, and just under 70% were taken off
the waiting list because they were happy with the treatment. In another study
of 50 similar women, 82% avoided major surgery.
The Mirena is now licensed
for treating heavy periods, and although this official licensing is relatively
new, it has been used 'off-license' for some time in this way.
Painful periods
Although the IUS isn't primarily used for painful periods, two studies
have found that it does help in many cases (as often as 80% of the time). If
painful periods persist, it is usual to rule out any other problems with a
laparoscopy.
Fibroids
Large fibroids are a common cause of heavy periods. If
they are so large,
or in such a position that they make the inside of the womb an abnormal shape,
it is unlikely that the Mirena will remain in place, and would not be helpful
as a treatment. With small to moderate size fibroids, it is quite reasonable
to use the IUS and one study has found that fibroids are less common in
women who use the Mirena. A further paper has found that in the 5 women studied,
a
Mirena actually reduced the size of their fibroids. This is only one report,
of course, and the IUS cannot be recommended as a treatment for fibroids based
on this alone, though it is very interesting.
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS)
PMS
is a syndrome that is thought to be caused by the varying hormones of the menstrual
cycle. There have been suggestions that the IUS may be useful as it will allow
a continuous dose of hormones to be given (oestrogen) without the worry of
excessive stimulation of the lining of the womb. Usually oestrogens are combined
with a
course of a progestagen to prevent this, but many women experience PMS-like
symptoms with progestagens. At present there is little published in the medical
literature
about the use of the Mirena in this way, but for severe cases, where hysterectomy
is being considered as the only remaining alternative, it would certainly be
reasonable to consider this.
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)
There is a growing
experience with the use of the IUS for women who require hormone replacement
therapy, but who have either bad PMS-like symptoms or erratic bleeding on normal
HRT preparations. The IUS with continuous implants, tablets or patches of oestrogen
provides good symptom relief with minimal side effects. As its use in this
way is not generally established in the UK, this would normally be prescribed
under
the care of a gynaecologist. In other countries (eg. Finland) the IUS is licensed
for use in this way and can be routinely used for up to 5 years.
Ectopic pregnancy
Women who have experienced an ectopic pregnancy are at a greater risk of
this happening again in future pregnancies. For this reason, they are advised
to
choose a type of contraception that does not increase this risk any further
- in particular they are encouraged to avoid IUCD's, as these are known to
increase this risk.
The risk of ectopic pregnancy is very much lower with the IUS than in women
not using any contraception (60 times lower, in fact). Although perhaps not
a first
choice, the IUS may be considered when other contraceptives are really not
suitable. As with most decisions in medicine, it is about the balance of
risk.
Side effects
Expulsion. In the early months of use, there is a very small chance that the
IUS may dislodge and come out, either in part or altogether. This risk may
be greater than with other IUCD's, presumably because it is that bit larger.
There
may be symptoms such as bleeding or persistent pain not relieved by simple
pain killers, or it might be passed without any discomfort at all. As the system
reduces
blood flow, sudden return of heavy periods might suggest this has happened.
Hormonal problems. Although the IUS delivers its hormone directly to the lining
of the
womb, it does lead to a slight increase in progesterone levels in the blood
stream. The levels are much lower than that found with the progestagen-only
pill (POP)
and usually don't lead to side effects. If they do occur, most often they are
mild and only last up to 4-6 weeks. Side effects have included headache, water
retention, breast tenderness or acne.
Ovarian cysts. Progestagen hormones increase
the chance of benign, simple ovarian cysts. This is more common with the higher
hormone levels associated with the progestagen-only pill. Overall the risk
is about 3 times higher (1.2% in IUS users versus 0.4% normally). These cysts
most
often do not require any treatment and resolve on their own over 2-3 months.
It is usual to arrange follow-up ultrasound scans over this time if they do
occur. The most common symptoms of a cyst is abdominal pain that doesn't settle
with
simple painkillers.
Bleeding problems. These are without a doubt the most common
problem associated with the Mirena. It takes about 3 months for the lining
of the womb to thin down and during this time bleeding can be erratic or
even heavy
at times, but almost always settles after 3-6 months. During the first month,
20% of users experience prolonged bleeding of more than 8 days duration,
but by the third month only 3% have prolonged bleeding. Pelvic infection.
In general
IUCD's increase the risk of infection of the womb, tubes and other pelvic
organs. Studies looking at Mirena suggest that this may not be the case,
with the IUS
being protective against infection, particularly in the age group most at
risk (<25y). Although this would fit with the thickening of the cervical
mucus preventing infection getting through the cervix, this finding is not
universal in all
studies. The actual long-term risk of infection is very low, at less than
1% with 5 years'
use. A World Health Organisation study of over 22,000 users found that the
infection risk was only increased in the first 20 days after insertion. This
demonstrates
the need to rule out infection in high-risk women before inserting the IUS,
and in this group a Chlamydia screen is advised.
Conclusion
The IUS is an effective contraceptive
and treatment for heavy periods. It reduces menstrual pain, may be used with
small to moderate fibroids and has the potential as a treatment for severe
PMS. It is associated with a low risk of ectopic pregnancy and infection. It
may be
more difficult to insert than standard IUCD's, in some women can lead to mild
hormonal effects, and commonly causes irregular bleeding in the initial months,
though this usually settles by 3-6 months. It is a particularly good treatment
choice for women with heavy periods who wish to avoid major surgery.
Womens' Health